Uniform Civil Code Questionnaire from Law Commission of India
The Biggest Debate:
According to various sources, Youtube videos, Social Media and Special news channel interviews with Muslim Personal Law board members and political figures, it is very clear that every Muslim objects the uniform civil code and wants no change in the Muslim Personal Law.
Here is the Uniform Civil Code Questionnaire from Law Commission of India
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf
The continuing discussion about the survey distributed from the Law Commission about the proposed implementation of the Standard Civil Code as well as the expected knee jerk result of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), is just an excellent chance to discover the fundamentals of conflict resolution. With over forty years’ expertise in settlement, conflict resolution and settlement on three locations dealing with folks of different sexes, contests, politics, beliefs and countries, I do want to discuss my findings and an alternate viewpoint of exactly what the strategy might be, rather than the boycott of the survey the AIMPLB has announced.
While settling and managing issues, among the most important skills will be able to split up the reality from inferences. To split up facts in the feelings that activities or these details may inspire. That's not because opinion, inference and speculation are unimportant. They're. But if you don't start with the fundamental facts, you'll not have the ability to consider objective decisions about them. Then can the strategy not one and become obvious but usually several options appear. Or even, the other is just responding meaning one is considering just in a yes-no means and that's probably the limiting and most challenging method to think.
It seems to me the phone to boycott the survey can be an emotional response towards the fact the survey originates from Regulations Commission that will be an arm of the federal government. Considering that this government particularly continues to be accountable for vitiating the calm environment of the nation by remaining quiet despite a myriad of violence against Muslims and Dalits within the title of alleged ‘Cow Vigilantism’, it's just natural that it's not considered being Muslim/Dalit helpful. Its plan to obtain the Muslim Personal Legislation eliminated as well as the UCC applied, established fact.
But surprisingly what few have stopped to request is has got the authorities not tabled the Uniform Civil Code for debate by all worried?’The the truth is that just what exists could be applied. After all of the government isn't saying, then apply it.’ It's saying that it really wants to implement the UCC and ‘We have to produce a Standard Civil Code. So desk it. Allow the nation see what it's the government wants to apply.
Regulations aren't produced in the Supreme Court. They're produced in the Legislature. So allow the UCC be delivered before the whole country. Allow the folks of India then allow it to move into law within the Legislature and debate it. That's the democratic process and let's follow it. What's the requirement to test seemingly covert techniques utilizing the Law Commission? Regulations Commission isn't the Legislature. Permit obligation be shouldered their elected representatives in Parliament; the folks of India as well as by these to whom it goes. I'm sure nobody could target to following a process.
With that said, within the famous event of ‘Shamim Ara versus state-of UP (2002)’, the Supreme Court announced triple Talaq invalid and prohibited. Just how could you ban a factor that is restricted? And thus therefore how come among the concerns within the Regulation Commission’s survey about triple Talaq?
Does Regulations Commission seek to complete exactly what the AIMPLB didn’t do for fourteen years (around this writing in 2016), i.e. enhance the issue of the bar on triple Talaq again? Because of the strident calls to boycott the survey as well as the statements the AIMPLB (which apparently uses the word, ‘Muslims of India’ unilaterally and with no recommendation in the supposed ‘Muslims of India’) won't accept any ‘interference’ within the Muslim Personal Law, it's relevant to ask why this phone wasn't provided in 2002? Didn’t instantly become reality today after all of the obligation to struggle for the regulations. What exactly the AIMPLB do for 14 years? No protests yelling disturbance in Shariah and Particular Law?
I offer in the covering letter of the survey that will be entitled, ‘APPEAL’ and that you can continue reading the hyperlink above, “The Law Commission of India embraces all involved to interact around about the extensive exercise of the modification and change of household guidelines whilst the Post 44 of the Indian Constitution provides that ‘the condition will try to supply for the people a standard civil signal through the place of India.’ (Italics are mine)
It's obvious out of this september start that as the Indian Constitution’s Article 44 provides the ‘State will try to supply for the people a standard civil code’, it didn’t identify how that is to be achieved. There might be many methods to get to a standard civil signal which range from developing a municipal signal from damage to credit all or areas of it from elsewhere, to using areas of the present Individual Regulations of various beliefs to reach at the one that is appropriate to everyone.
Imagine a Civil Code that requires from everyone to provide people the same of the HUF/Karta/IT credits, flexibility to bear arms, marry four times, and wear turbans and beards (males only please). The grass seems greener about the other aspect of the wall. But cracks aside, the survey certainly appears like it's addressing various other, not-so-noble goals.
I started using the request that people have to examine details. So here are a few for people to think about.
Laws can’t change social behavior. Let's ask how the truth for women have changed. When they they haven’t, plus haven’t will information regulations do?
Safety of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005)
Indecent Representation of Females (Prohibition) Act (1986)
Dowry Prohibition Act (1961)
Nirbhaya Act (2013)
The thing is not Talaq but of men remembering women's rights. For that report I would like to say what I've mentioned often that triple Talaq isn't consistent with Sunnah and the Qur’an. It's not the recommended method to provide Talaq within the Shariah.
Triple Talaq is itself a violation of the Shariah and thus it's declared Haraam and Bidat colleges and by all of the jurists of jurisprudence in Islam. Someone in the exact same air call it legitimate as well as may announce anything Haraam and Bidat is something just the Mufti's mind could understand.
Thankfully I'm not blessed having a mind that may feel around edges therefore I pass exactly what the Book of Allahï·» claims and what Their Messengerï·º did. Triple Talaq was helped by neither.
It's unusual and even laughable ‘We won't mean disturbance within the Shariah’ and that these mental conditions by both parties, ‘Triple Talaq must be banned’, are both evidently blind to two primary facts:
That triple Talaq was already restricted in 2002 (awaken)
The truth of Muslim women will not alter at all
However, the issues that Muslim women are experiencing aren't a direct result Talaq (multiple or not) but of the un-islamic traditions and methods that people haven't only allowed into our partnerships but have made them necessary. Islam prohibits. We need it which is paid. Islam puts the whole liability of experiencing all costs for that relationship about the guy but we insist on throwing them about she and the lady and this is accepted by her family.
Islam mandates that partnerships should be cheap and easy but we insist on costly, ostentatious weddings.Islam prohibits any type of nuisance at that time of divorce if that will become necessary but our guys do the alternative.
Much more and all these would be the actual reasons why Muslim women are left dried and large and therefore are the victims of their men's oppression. Is banning triple Talaq likely to resolve these issues?
The truth that triple Talaq was restricted in 2002 however the issues continue, such as the fact that individuals remain providing triple Talaq, must provide the Law Commission (and people) cause enough to stop and reveal if regulations alone are enough to result in cultural change or whether we've to interact, helping and supporting one another to result in gender justice. We have to use sincerity and reliability and refuse political jugglery, hidden agendas, fraud and all guile. It's just the reality that will win.
What exactly if the AIMPLB do?
Take that juristic law doesn’t have priority over Divine Writ. Talaq stated in the Qur’an is Divine Writ. Triple Talaq is juristic law. Therefore state triple Talaq that it'll be counted as you and to become unacceptable.
State Halala to become Haraam, which it is. The juristic reasons in its benefit are so that I choose and of course them here to make these jurists and the laughingstock of the planet, by inference, Islamic Law. The AIMPLB knows what these arguments are. They know they're wrong. And they also must state that Halala is Haraama.
Provide a significant role to women within the performance of the AIMPLB using the capacity to perform a major part, particularly in issues that concern women. Should guys rule on such issues whenever we have theologians and several highly skilled women students? AIMPLB must ask them about the Panel in it and provide them jobs of expert and real power.
Ask prominent Muslim people of civil society (man and woman); politicians, academicians, attorneys, businesspeople, writers, teachers, youth leaders, cultural activists and directors to become members of the Table. I'm pleased if they're interested to supply the Panel having an organization framework for this.
Proceed to English as its language of conversation since its existing language, not to mention others, Urdu, isn't the language also of Indian Muslims and it is a significant obstacle in thought share in addition to in speaking using the remaining country.
Set of workplace along with a retirement for several People aside from who they might be. Lifetime job is harmful to organizational health.
It's important that on the planet of tomorrow and today the Table grows to be much more representative of Indian Muslims, if it expects to keep its place whilst the home-proclaimed leader of Muslims. It should shift from being self-announced to recommended consultant to become effective and really effective. You have to be representative to represent.
Which means equality, more openness, more power and more involvement. Which means the character of the Panel should vary from becoming an exceptional kids team to being a genuinely democratic, body of equals, all employed by the advantage of the country as well as the enjoyment of our Creator of elites.
Whenever we will meet Him for that period will certainly come. And in those days we shall not be asked, ‘What happened?’ we are asked.
Around the Web
Youtube to Mp3 Converter https://sites.google.com/site/yttomp3converter/
According to various sources, Youtube videos, Social Media and Special news channel interviews with Muslim Personal Law board members and political figures, it is very clear that every Muslim objects the uniform civil code and wants no change in the Muslim Personal Law.
Here is the Uniform Civil Code Questionnaire from Law Commission of India
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf
The continuing discussion about the survey distributed from the Law Commission about the proposed implementation of the Standard Civil Code as well as the expected knee jerk result of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), is just an excellent chance to discover the fundamentals of conflict resolution. With over forty years’ expertise in settlement, conflict resolution and settlement on three locations dealing with folks of different sexes, contests, politics, beliefs and countries, I do want to discuss my findings and an alternate viewpoint of exactly what the strategy might be, rather than the boycott of the survey the AIMPLB has announced.
While settling and managing issues, among the most important skills will be able to split up the reality from inferences. To split up facts in the feelings that activities or these details may inspire. That's not because opinion, inference and speculation are unimportant. They're. But if you don't start with the fundamental facts, you'll not have the ability to consider objective decisions about them. Then can the strategy not one and become obvious but usually several options appear. Or even, the other is just responding meaning one is considering just in a yes-no means and that's probably the limiting and most challenging method to think.
It seems to me the phone to boycott the survey can be an emotional response towards the fact the survey originates from Regulations Commission that will be an arm of the federal government. Considering that this government particularly continues to be accountable for vitiating the calm environment of the nation by remaining quiet despite a myriad of violence against Muslims and Dalits within the title of alleged ‘Cow Vigilantism’, it's just natural that it's not considered being Muslim/Dalit helpful. Its plan to obtain the Muslim Personal Legislation eliminated as well as the UCC applied, established fact.
But surprisingly what few have stopped to request is has got the authorities not tabled the Uniform Civil Code for debate by all worried?’The the truth is that just what exists could be applied. After all of the government isn't saying, then apply it.’ It's saying that it really wants to implement the UCC and ‘We have to produce a Standard Civil Code. So desk it. Allow the nation see what it's the government wants to apply.
Regulations aren't produced in the Supreme Court. They're produced in the Legislature. So allow the UCC be delivered before the whole country. Allow the folks of India then allow it to move into law within the Legislature and debate it. That's the democratic process and let's follow it. What's the requirement to test seemingly covert techniques utilizing the Law Commission? Regulations Commission isn't the Legislature. Permit obligation be shouldered their elected representatives in Parliament; the folks of India as well as by these to whom it goes. I'm sure nobody could target to following a process.
With that said, within the famous event of ‘Shamim Ara versus state-of UP (2002)’, the Supreme Court announced triple Talaq invalid and prohibited. Just how could you ban a factor that is restricted? And thus therefore how come among the concerns within the Regulation Commission’s survey about triple Talaq?
Does Regulations Commission seek to complete exactly what the AIMPLB didn’t do for fourteen years (around this writing in 2016), i.e. enhance the issue of the bar on triple Talaq again? Because of the strident calls to boycott the survey as well as the statements the AIMPLB (which apparently uses the word, ‘Muslims of India’ unilaterally and with no recommendation in the supposed ‘Muslims of India’) won't accept any ‘interference’ within the Muslim Personal Law, it's relevant to ask why this phone wasn't provided in 2002? Didn’t instantly become reality today after all of the obligation to struggle for the regulations. What exactly the AIMPLB do for 14 years? No protests yelling disturbance in Shariah and Particular Law?
I offer in the covering letter of the survey that will be entitled, ‘APPEAL’ and that you can continue reading the hyperlink above, “The Law Commission of India embraces all involved to interact around about the extensive exercise of the modification and change of household guidelines whilst the Post 44 of the Indian Constitution provides that ‘the condition will try to supply for the people a standard civil signal through the place of India.’ (Italics are mine)
It's obvious out of this september start that as the Indian Constitution’s Article 44 provides the ‘State will try to supply for the people a standard civil code’, it didn’t identify how that is to be achieved. There might be many methods to get to a standard civil signal which range from developing a municipal signal from damage to credit all or areas of it from elsewhere, to using areas of the present Individual Regulations of various beliefs to reach at the one that is appropriate to everyone.
Imagine a Civil Code that requires from everyone to provide people the same of the HUF/Karta/IT credits, flexibility to bear arms, marry four times, and wear turbans and beards (males only please). The grass seems greener about the other aspect of the wall. But cracks aside, the survey certainly appears like it's addressing various other, not-so-noble goals.
I started using the request that people have to examine details. So here are a few for people to think about.
Laws can’t change social behavior. Let's ask how the truth for women have changed. When they they haven’t, plus haven’t will information regulations do?
Safety of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005)
Indecent Representation of Females (Prohibition) Act (1986)
Dowry Prohibition Act (1961)
Nirbhaya Act (2013)
The thing is not Talaq but of men remembering women's rights. For that report I would like to say what I've mentioned often that triple Talaq isn't consistent with Sunnah and the Qur’an. It's not the recommended method to provide Talaq within the Shariah.
Triple Talaq is itself a violation of the Shariah and thus it's declared Haraam and Bidat colleges and by all of the jurists of jurisprudence in Islam. Someone in the exact same air call it legitimate as well as may announce anything Haraam and Bidat is something just the Mufti's mind could understand.
Thankfully I'm not blessed having a mind that may feel around edges therefore I pass exactly what the Book of Allahï·» claims and what Their Messengerï·º did. Triple Talaq was helped by neither.
It's unusual and even laughable ‘We won't mean disturbance within the Shariah’ and that these mental conditions by both parties, ‘Triple Talaq must be banned’, are both evidently blind to two primary facts:
That triple Talaq was already restricted in 2002 (awaken)
The truth of Muslim women will not alter at all
However, the issues that Muslim women are experiencing aren't a direct result Talaq (multiple or not) but of the un-islamic traditions and methods that people haven't only allowed into our partnerships but have made them necessary. Islam prohibits. We need it which is paid. Islam puts the whole liability of experiencing all costs for that relationship about the guy but we insist on throwing them about she and the lady and this is accepted by her family.
Islam mandates that partnerships should be cheap and easy but we insist on costly, ostentatious weddings.Islam prohibits any type of nuisance at that time of divorce if that will become necessary but our guys do the alternative.
Much more and all these would be the actual reasons why Muslim women are left dried and large and therefore are the victims of their men's oppression. Is banning triple Talaq likely to resolve these issues?
The truth that triple Talaq was restricted in 2002 however the issues continue, such as the fact that individuals remain providing triple Talaq, must provide the Law Commission (and people) cause enough to stop and reveal if regulations alone are enough to result in cultural change or whether we've to interact, helping and supporting one another to result in gender justice. We have to use sincerity and reliability and refuse political jugglery, hidden agendas, fraud and all guile. It's just the reality that will win.
What exactly if the AIMPLB do?
Take that juristic law doesn’t have priority over Divine Writ. Talaq stated in the Qur’an is Divine Writ. Triple Talaq is juristic law. Therefore state triple Talaq that it'll be counted as you and to become unacceptable.
State Halala to become Haraam, which it is. The juristic reasons in its benefit are so that I choose and of course them here to make these jurists and the laughingstock of the planet, by inference, Islamic Law. The AIMPLB knows what these arguments are. They know they're wrong. And they also must state that Halala is Haraama.
Provide a significant role to women within the performance of the AIMPLB using the capacity to perform a major part, particularly in issues that concern women. Should guys rule on such issues whenever we have theologians and several highly skilled women students? AIMPLB must ask them about the Panel in it and provide them jobs of expert and real power.
Ask prominent Muslim people of civil society (man and woman); politicians, academicians, attorneys, businesspeople, writers, teachers, youth leaders, cultural activists and directors to become members of the Table. I'm pleased if they're interested to supply the Panel having an organization framework for this.
Proceed to English as its language of conversation since its existing language, not to mention others, Urdu, isn't the language also of Indian Muslims and it is a significant obstacle in thought share in addition to in speaking using the remaining country.
Set of workplace along with a retirement for several People aside from who they might be. Lifetime job is harmful to organizational health.
It's important that on the planet of tomorrow and today the Table grows to be much more representative of Indian Muslims, if it expects to keep its place whilst the home-proclaimed leader of Muslims. It should shift from being self-announced to recommended consultant to become effective and really effective. You have to be representative to represent.
Which means equality, more openness, more power and more involvement. Which means the character of the Panel should vary from becoming an exceptional kids team to being a genuinely democratic, body of equals, all employed by the advantage of the country as well as the enjoyment of our Creator of elites.
Whenever we will meet Him for that period will certainly come. And in those days we shall not be asked, ‘What happened?’ we are asked.
Around the Web
Youtube to Mp3 Converter https://sites.google.com/site/yttomp3converter/
Posts
No comments
Post a Comment